点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
“五个一百”：为岁月赋荣光，给人民以力量******
中青声评丨“五个一百”：为岁月赋荣光，给人民以力量
人民需要什么样的力量？
团结奋进新征程，同心奋斗创伟业。近日，2022中国正能量“五个一百”网络精品征集评选展播活动进入报送阶段，一个个精彩作品如点点星火，汇聚成炬，照亮前行的方向。
由中央网信办主办的2022中国正能量“五个一百”网络精品征集评选展播活动至今已举办六届，期间涌现了无数凡人英雄模范、传奇感人事迹，展现了新时代发展巨变。深入作品，情系其中，文字将内心的温度化为指尖的力量，承载着光阴的印记；影像定格精彩瞬间，串联起奋斗者的足迹，正能量的主旋律高昂澎湃。
人无精神不立，国无精神不强。走向复兴，走向辉煌，既需强大的物质力量，亦需强大的精神力量。“五个一百”正是用记录的点滴星芒，去鼓舞平凡者的守望，让人人都能在新时代新征程上形成“披荆斩棘、奋勇前行”的个体意识，继而凝聚社会集体的意志与共识，构筑时代洪流里昂扬奋进的生动注脚。
人民需要真善美的力量。“云山苍苍，江水泱泱，先生之风，山高水长。”唯有知真、尽善，方可各美其美、美美与共。习近平总书记强调：“只要中华民族一代接着一代追求真善美的道德境界，我们的民族就永远健康向上、永远充满希望。”我们看到，因时因势战“疫”，衣着白衣“铠甲”的最美逆行者冲锋在前，科研工作者分秒必争铸造生物“盾牌”，为战“疫”大局提供有力支持；看到落红有情，化作春泥，把青春华章谱写在群山之间的老师，还有获得“2022中国经济年度人物特别奖”的快递外卖小哥代表，在奔跑中传递人间烟火，用行动诠释人间大爱……人们在守望相助间流动着温暖与关切，在与人为善、与邻为友中，真切感受到人间有情、世间有爱、生活美好。我们需要真善美的力量，因为真善美的行为最为打动人，真善美的力量最为鼓舞人。
人民需要自信、自立、自强的力量。树高叶茂，系于根深，自力更生是中华民族自立于世界民族之林的奋斗基点。民族复兴、国家富强、人民幸福，离不开自信、自立、自强的精神力量。“天宫”遥筑苍穹，“复兴号”贴地飞行，“福建舰”驰骋远洋。目之所及，身之所往，一个个举世属瞩目的发展成就，让今天的中国人民更有志气、骨气和底气，坚持中国式现代化发展道路，创造更多的中国奇迹。
人民需要接续奋斗的力量。“千磨万击还坚劲，任尔东西南北风。”奋斗创造伟业，实干成就未来。看冬奥健儿赛场摘金夺银，观大国工匠让中国制造绽放异彩，瞻建设者们逢山开路、遇水搭桥，蜀道之难不再难。每个人都是奋斗的主角，每一份付出都映照着梦想的天空。国之所需，吾之所向，积力之所举则无不胜，众智之所为则无不成。以奋斗为舟、劳动作桨，接续奋斗、永远奋斗，我们需要这样的精神力量，当好新时代新征程的主人翁，实现人生价值、创造美好生活、建功伟大时代。
人民需要让未来更美好的力量。有所为，有所爱，有所期待。对生活有期待，我们拥抱青春、不负韶华，在酸甜苦辣的人生百味中感悟生命的真谛；对工作有期待，我们脚踏实地、埋头苦干，用一点一滴的努力去实现梦想；对未来有期待，我们播撒种子、耕耘希望，让期待的嫩芽萌发成长为华盖参天的未来。因为美好的憧憬与期盼，会让我们更踏实、更幸福、更充实，会指引我们勇敢跨越山海，冲破阴霾，给我们面对不确定的勇气，点亮生命的光辉。
“五个一百”，每个人都是答卷人，我们用探索与实践的点滴，迎面时代抛出的问题，汇聚成波澜壮阔的中国力量，为岁月赋荣光，给人民以力量，让明天的中国更美好！(声、文/张婷)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)